Public Administration G (8556.3)
Available teaching periods | Delivery mode | Location |
---|---|---|
View teaching periods | ||
EFTSL | Credit points | Faculty |
0.125 | 3 | Faculty Of Business, Government & Law |
Discipline | Study level | HECS Bands |
Institute For Governance And Policy Analysis | Graduate Level | Band 4 2021 (Commenced After 1 Jan 2021) Band 4 2021 (Commenced After 1 Jan Social Work_Exclude 0905) Band 5 2021 (Commenced Before 1 Jan 2021) |
Learning outcomes
On successful completion of this unit, students will be able to:1. Understand the principles and values underpinning traditional and contemporary models of public administration; comprehend the agendas, values and processes involved in the current reform of public sectors; and
2. Critically appreciate the patterns of change across systems and over time; demonstrate basic competencies in the written and oral presentation of academic work.
Corequisites
None.Assumed knowledge
None.Year | Location | Teaching period | Teaching start date | Delivery mode | Unit convener |
---|
Required texts
4: Unit Resources
4a General public administration readings
Aulich, C. & Evans, M. (eds.), (2012), The Rudd Government, ANU Press.
Aulich, C. (ed), (2014), The Gillard Governments, University of Melbourne Press.
Aulich, C. (2016), From Abbott to Turnbull: a New Direction, Canberra, Echo Books.
Bovaird, T and Loffler, E. (2003), Public Management and Governance Routledge, London.
Christensen,T. Laegreid, P. Roness, P & Rovik, K (2007), Organization Theory and the Public Sector, Routledge, London.
Evans, M., Grattan M., and McCaffrie, B. (2019) From Turnbull to Morrison: The Trust Divide, Melbourne: MUP
Flynn, N (2007), Public Sector Management (5th edition) Sage, London.
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. (2011), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stoker, G. and Evans, M. (eds). (2016), Evidence-based Policymaking in the Social Sciences: Methods that Matter, Bristol, Policy Press.
Journals you may wish to consult include:
American Review of Public Administration
Australian Journal of Political Science
Australian Journal of Public Administration
Governance
International Journal of Public Administration
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Journal of Public Policy
Parliamentary Affairs
Public Administration
Public Administration Today
Public Administration Review
Public Money and Management
Public Policy
Policy Studies
Political Studies
Policy and Politics
The Canvas site for this Unit will contain a number of readings which students will find useful. All pre-readings will be posted and we will add additional readings for assessment tasks.
Students must apply academic integrity in their learning and research activities at UC. This includes submitting authentic and original work for assessments and properly acknowledging any sources used.
Academic integrity involves the ethical, honest and responsible use, creation and sharing of information. It is critical to the quality of higher education. Our academic integrity values are honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility and courage.
UC students have to complete the Academic Integrity Module annually to learn about academic integrity and to understand the consequences of academic integrity breaches (or academic misconduct).
UC uses various strategies and systems, including detection software, to identify potential breaches of academic integrity. Suspected breaches may be investigated, and action can be taken when misconduct is found to have occurred.
Information is provided in the Academic Integrity Policy, Academic Integrity Procedure, and University of Canberra (Student Conduct) Rules 2023. For further advice, visit Study Skills.
Participation requirements
None
Required IT skills
None
In-unit costs
None
Work placement, internships or practicums
None