|
ABSTRACT:
The attenuation
property of Ebony wood and Perspex, as well as the radiographic contrast
produced by these materials, were studied along side those of aluminium,
tin and copper metals (for comparison) at the x-ray energy of 67kV and
40mAs, to assess the possibility of the adoption of Ebony wood and Perspex
as x-ray cassette window materials. Results obtained revealed that ebony
wood and Perspex attenuated the beam moderately (42.3% and 47.4%, respectively)
and recorded radiographic contrast values above 0.5 (50% of optimum contrast
in radiology), higher than values obtained for tin and copper, but less
than contrast values recorded with aluminium. The results suggest the
possibility of the use of ebony wood and Perspex, probably with treatment
for enhancement, as x-ray cassette window materials, in addition to their
use as shielding materials at much lower energies.
Keywords: Attenuation,
Ebony wood, Perspex, Cassette, Contrast
INTRODUCTION
:
Radiographic image quality
is a primary factor in the utility of a radiograph for diagnostic purposes.
The image must contain certain diagnostic information in a form that
is easy to extract visually. The ease with which this information is
extracted is dependent on the magnitude of the densities and density
difference (Jenkins,1981) recorded on the radiograph.
Such densities are themselves
heavily dependent on several factors, like exposure factors, thickness
of the part irradiated, the attenuation properties of the cassette front
radiolucent window, among others (Christensen et al, 1978). The attenuation
properties of a material determine its attenuation coefficient, which
is a measure of the quantity of radiation attenuated by a unit thickness
of that material traversed (Christensen et al, 1978; Hay & Hughes, 1978;
Ekpe & Essien, 1999). Different materials have different attenuation
properties because of different factors which include the nature of
radiation, the properties of the medium - atomic number, density and
electrons per cubic centimeter (Mescham & OH, 1984 ; Brant and Helms,
1998).
The quality of the transmitted
beam, is therefore dependent on the attenuation properties of the traversed
material and determines the quality of the radiographic image, which
is formed on a light sensitive medium, the x-ray film (Jenkins, 1981;
Chesney & Chesney, 1981). Materials used in x-ray cassette manufacturing
are made into light tight containers and are made to have a uniform
radiolucent cassette front (Jenkins, 1981; Egbe, 2004), which serves
as the window for x-ray transmission to reach the recording medium.
Several materials have been used for this purpose some of which have
already been dropped. However research into the possible utility of
some other materials is needful, as the search for optimum benefits
in image quality (Corr, 2001) and radiation protection (Munro, 2004)
continues. Usually low attenuating materials are utilized in the making
of x-ray cassettes since much of the radiation beam needs to reach the
detector (film) to record the image. Poor film contrast, as one of the
determinants of image quality, will introduce the necessity of repeated
radiograph with the attendant undesirable effects on patient dose increase.
This work focuses principally
on the attenuation of wood (Ebony) and Perspex used as cassette front
(window) materials, side by side with aluminium, copper and tin, with
a view to possible adoption of these materials for further development
as cassette front materials, particularly in places where these materials
exist in abundance.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS :
Cassettes were constructed
using the materials under study - aluminum, copper, tin and Perspex and
wood. Construction was such that the cassette window, through which x-radiation
passes into the cassettes to reach the film, was made of a thin sheet
of the test material (2.0 mm thickness) and calcium tungstate based intensifying
screens (which emit blue) attached to the back of the window material.
Screen type films of the Konica media were placed within the boxes, which
had provision for being locked. The experimental cassettes were then severally
and individually exposed to x-radiation from a high frequency single-phase
x-ray generator having a maximum output of 150kVp, 500mA and 0.5 seconds,
and a minimum output of 45kVp, 50mA and 0.001 seconds, respectively. Exposures
were made at 67kVp, 200mA and 0.2 seconds (40mAs), with the selection
of factors based on the variable kV method for adult mid-thigh measurement
of 20cm, described by Munro, (2004). The experimental set up is as shown
in Figure 1, below.

Bone and water phantom materials
(dry pelvic bone and a sachet of water in a cellophane bag) were placed
above the cassette front window being tested, for determination of contrast
(image quality). One thermoluminiscent dosimeter (LiF) chip each, labeled
as TLD A and TLD B, respectively, were placed above and immediately
below the cassette window to measure the "skin dose" (above) and the
transmitted intensity (below), of the x-ray beam, respectively. The
TLD chips were read with a vinten solaro TLD reader calibrated in µSv,
and the attenuated components of the beam for each material was computed
using Equation 1, below :
TLD A - TLD B
= Attenuated quantity (Eq.
1)
The exposed films were processed
manually for 3 minutes, in a developer bath with temperature 26oC,
then fixed and washed for 10 and 30 minutes respectively. Processed
films were dried in a separate dryer (Holm, 2000; Lloyd, 2001) and the
recorded densities read with a Sakura model PDA - 85 digital densitometer
From these, contrast between the bone and the water phantom determined
for assessment of the radiographic contrast by Equation 2, below :
Dw - Db = Contrast (Eq.
2)
where Dw and Db
represent the density readings for bone and water phantom, from the
densitometer.
The attenuation coefficients
were determined from the mathematical relationship expressed in Equation
3 (Hay & Hughes, 1978; Ekpe & Essien, 1999; Inyang et al, 1999).
I
= Io e-µx (Eq.
3)
All the results obtained
are presented in Table 1 below.
Table
1: Transmission of the x-ray beam by different window materials
|
Window
material
|
TLD
Readings µSv
|
%
Attenuation
|
µ
mm-1
|
Mean
Contrast with SD
|
|
TLD
A
|
TLD
B
|
TLD
A - TLD B
|
|
Tin
|
1.94
± 0.01
|
0.82
± 0.01
|
1.12
|
57.7
|
-
0.187
|
0.32
± 0.01
|
|
Copper
|
1.94
± 0.01
|
0.98
± 0.01
|
0.96
|
49.5
|
-
0.148
|
0.38
± 0.01
|
|
Aluminium
|
1.94
± 0.01
|
1.61
± 0.01
|
0.33
|
17.0
|
-
0.040
|
0.75
± 0.1
|
|
Perspex
|
1.94
± 0.01
|
1.02
± 0.01
|
0.92
|
47.4
|
-
0.140
|
0.59
± 0.01
|
|
Wood
(Ebony)
|
1.94
± 0.01
|
1.12
± 0.01
|
0.82
|
42.3
|
-
0.119
|
0.54
± 0.01
|
DISCUSSION
:
Usually low attenuating materials
are utilized in the making of x-ray cassette front since much of the
primary beam is required to reach the detector - x-ray film, to form
the image. However, the attenuation of the primary beam is usually not
altogether due to absorption by the traversed material, but is equally
dependent on the scattered component of the beam (Ching-Shen & Shyi-Ming,
1996; Ekpe & Essien, 1999). Transmitted intensity is dependent on the
density and the thickness of the traversed material, as well as other
factors, which also include the energy of the beam (Ekpe & Essien, 1999).
The absorbed component is due to energy losses within the material as
a result of interactions between the radiation and the atoms in the
material (Ching-Shen & Shyi-Ming, 1996; Ekpe & Essien, 1999). The magnitude
of the aluminium equivalent of the material is a determinant of the
image contrast (Egbe, 2004).
Our results show that the
materials used in this study as cassette window for x-ray transmission,
showed relatively moderate attenuation of the beam at the energy used.
The attenuation properties of Perspex and Ebony wood present some interesting
results, suggesting the possibility of their use as radiation shielding
materials at low energies. Poor radiographic contrast, as one of the
parameters used in assessing image quality, usually will introduce the
necessity for repeated radiographs with the attendant undesirable effect
on patient dose. This is one reason low attenuating materials that combine
production of an image of good diagnostic quality (having acceptable
contrast) are preferred for diagnostic radiography.
Images produced by the different
materials studied of the bone and water phantoms showed long scale contrast
for tin and copper, with significant shades of grey, while the image
produced by the aluminium window showed short scale contrast (large
difference in densities recorded) (Munro, 2004). Perspex and wood recorded
appreciable contrast - somewhere between the two scales. This suggests
that Perspex and wood, perhaps with proper treatment, could be used
for making specialized cassettes for radiographic examinations requiring
mid-scale contrast images.
CONCLUSION
:
From the foregoing, Ebony
wood and Perspex could be useful as x-ray cassette front materials at
energies of less or equal to 67kV.
REFERENCES
:
Jenkins, D: Radiographic
imaging and Photographic Processes. MTP. England . 302p. (1982).
Christensen, E. E; Curry,
T. S. and Danley, J. E. An Introduction to the Physics of Diagnostic
Radiology. 2nd Edition. London. Henry Kingston. 450p. (1978).
Hay, G. A. & Hughes, D.:
First Year Physics for Radiographers. 2nd Ed. London. Bailliere Tindall.
271p. (1978)
Ekpe, S. D. & Essien, I.
O.: Measurements of Attenuation Coefficient of Clay and Laterite Soils
as Building materials using Gamma radiation. Integrated Journal of Science
& engineering. 2(1): 59 - 62.
Meschem, I; OH. D. J. The
scope of Diagnostic Imaging In: Introduction to Diagnostic Imaging.
London. W. B. Saunders co. pp 1- 6. (1984)
Brant, W. E & Helms, C. A.
(Eds.). Basic Principles In: Diagnostic Imaging Methods. USA. Williams
& Williams, pp. 3 - 19. (1998)
Chesney, D. N. & Chesney,
M. O. radiographic Imaging. 4th ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications.
487p.
Egbe, N. O.: Laboratory Guide
for Radiography Students. University of Calabar Press, Nigeria. 77p.
Corr, P: Image Quality Optimization
and Control In: Pattern Recognition in Diagnostic Imaging. WHO. Geneva,
pp. 3 - 15. (2001).
Munro, L.: Basics of Radiation
Protection - How to Achieve ALARA: Working Tips and guidelines. Ostensen,
H & Inglfsdottir, G (Eds.). WHO. Geneva, 83p. (2004).
Holm, T.: Consumer Guide
for the Purchase of X-ray Equipment. (Rev.1). WHO. Geneva. 24p. (2000).
Llyod, P. J.: Manual Film
Processing In: Quality Assurance Workbook for Radiographers & Radiological
Technologists. WHO. Geneva, pp. 78 - 93. (2001)
Inyang, S. O; Egbe, N. O.
& Essien, I. E.: Radiological Shielding Property of Clay determined
with Thermoluminiscent Detector. Integrated Journal of Science & Engineering.
2(2): 69 - 72
Ching-Shen, Su & Shyi-Ming
Yeh : UV attenuation coefficients in water determined by TLD. Radiation
Measurements. 26(1): 83 - 86
|